Is There a “Web 2.0” Gap, Akin To The Pay Gap?

Penelope Trunk makes an observation and asks a very enlightened question:

"Instead of worrying about the wage gap let’s worry about the Web 2.0
gap. The second round of the Internet revolution is being run largely
by men. In fact, as tech companies need less and less marketing,
the usual spots for women in tech companies are disappearing. And as
the barrier to entry gets lower and lower, and founders get younger and younger,
the hours people put in to start a company verge on 100 percent of
waking time, something that women seem to be just plain not interested
in doing.

I am not sure what should be done about the Web 2.0 gap. I have a
feeling that it ends up getting more and more male-centric — just like
video games. For example, most blogs are aimed at technical types.
(Something we might be able to overcome.) Yet the most prominent blog
ranking site, Technorati, ranks blogs based on how many people link to
them. So a blog catering to people who don’t blog themselves would be
ranked lower in the blogosphere. The subtle burying of women’s voices
online.

I’m not sure if it’s a big deal or not. But I am definitely sure the
time gap and the Web 2.0 gap are having more impact on the business
opportunities women see than that statistically irrelevant pay gap is.
It’s just that the mainstream media is accustomed to writing about pay
gap, and not about who is playing poker with the founders of Digg and who is playing Xbox with the founders of Reddit."

Interesting perspective. (I’m still mulling this over and need to check some of the assertions above before buying in wholesale, but this sounds plausible at first blush.)  Your thoughts?

Blues at Blogher


Blues at Blogher
Originally uploaded by christophercarfi.

Over the next couple of days, I’ll be doing a little bit of photoblogging as well – great conference, and unbelievable venue here at Navy Pier in Chicago. I just walked outside the conference area to find this blues stage with band doing a screaming cover of Red House.

It’s good to be home. 🙂

By the way, if you want to subscribe to just the photo feed over the next couple of days, I’ll be posting the pics directly to Flickr and the photo feed is here.

Liveblogging Blogher: Building Your Blog and Site Traffic

Technical Tools To Build Traffic
Site description: "Grabbing an audience and keeping them engaged is enhanced by technical
know-how. We’re going to help you get some, including how to use
syndication to your best advantage, and a little DIY search engine
optimization. This is a reprise of what was one of our most popular
sessions at BlogHer Business in March, featuring, once again, Elise Bauer and Vanessa Fox."

The Top 5 Ways to build traffic:

  1. Link out to other bloggers
  2. Leave comments on their sites
  3. Plan and participate in blog events
  4. Contribute to the community
  5. Participate in social networks (put your blog in your profile)

Elise also shared a number of site design tips:

  • Image size (ideally under 15.5K each)
  • Page length and size (try to keep under 100k)
  • Font size (must be readable)
  • Reduce clutter
  • Color backgrounds (avoid for main text, too hard to read)
  • Search bars (have them up top where people can see them)
  • Categories (categorize your entres)
  • Multiple browsers
  • Screen resolution
  • Broken links (find and fix them)

Liveblogging Blogher: The Art of Storytelling

Staning room only at the Art of Storytelling sessionThe Art of Storytelling

Session description: "There have been many
calls for a session about the art of writing itself…how to improve
your writing, how to find your unique voice, etc. This session covers
narrative prose, and the blog as a platform for narrative prose
specifically. In a blogging world of 140 character posts on Twitter and
link posts posing as "content", is there a place for stories? Author,
blogger and screenwriter Claire Fontaine talks with other bloggers Birdie Jaworski and Ree from Confessions of a Pioneer Woman, about why they still find time to write intriguing beginnings, gripping middles and satisfying ends."

Audience:  We’re trying to build a collective story by way of interviewing a number of people.  What suggestions would you have?

Birdie:  I live in a small town in New Mexico.  The families in my area have an incredibly rich history, but no one ever tells them.  I went to the library, found old photographs of the community, and now I am showing the elder members of the community the photographs, and asked them to tell me about that place.  If you show people something that can be a visual cue, it can bring back a flood of memory.  It’s been fascinating.

Claire:  Asking the right questions is probably key.  If you can ask the right questions, it can tease those stories out.

A lot of interesting conversation of "telling stories" versus "blogging" or other similar forms.  Stories are just that … beginnings, middles, and ends.  Characters.  Narrative arc.  Stories are a very different creature than an episodic blog post that is not of any particular "form."

Audience:  Which are the stories that I want to keep close, and just for my family and friends?  Which ones do you put out there into the world?

Claire:  I just published a memoir.  For me, telling "risky" or "scary" stories from your past frees yourself.  The stuff that people respond to are the stories that we were originally afraid to publish. 

Claire asks herself three things every time she writes:  "Is it true? Is it clear?  Is it beautiful?"  But she also explicitly does NOT think about the "reader," as she would lose her "inner conversation" that creates her stories.  The only fact-checking is "am I telling the truth from within?"

Birdie uses contrast as a mechanism.  For example, she writes about a man in her town, and compares him to herself.  In doing so, she brings out more of what she is about and, at the end of the story, at which she and the subject are equal, but different.

Audience: What about "creative nonfiction," (yes, I know I’m using the term wrong) where I put two things together that were each true, but didn’t happen at the same time?  Or I leave out the middle of the story, because the beginning and end were the most interesting.  What’s the right way to do this?

Panel:  You *definitely* need to disclose that.  Even putting the phrase "based on a true story" will help to prevent you from getting into the trouble.  Or, if you’re not sure of a fact, preface it with "I think" or "in my opinion"…don’t state something as fact if that’s not the case.

Claire says "every story is an unanswered question."  And don’t answer that question until the end.  That mystery is the key.

 

Liveblogging Blogher: Life Stages of Online Communities

Blogher 07The Life Stages of Online Communities

Session overview: "Communities have a lifecycle. What we do to nurture them depends on
where a community is in its life. Talk with people at all stages of
managing online communities as part of for-profit and non-profit
endeavors. What are best practices, pitfalls and warning signs to look
for at the birth, growth spurt or middle-age of your community?"

  • Jane Goldman,
    editor-in-chief for several cnet communities, moderates this discussion
    with managers of communities at various life stages
  • Carol Lin.
    Carol is the former CNN anchor who left the network to care for her
    husband as he died from cancer. Carol is in the process of giving birth
    a new online community and social network deigned to support cancer
    families.
  • Betsy Aoki from
    Microsoft has been community manager for multiple developer and
    end-user communities…and has watched them go through their difficult
    adolescent phase and come out, well-adjusted, on the other side.
  • Aliza Sherman, aka CyberGrrl, has seen the birth…and death…of more than her fair share of online communities.

A few key points that have been made regarding growing a healthy community:

  • Find the "tipping point" connectors in your network, and let them know about the community.  Even if they may not participate, they may know others who will.
  • Have code of conduct, but have a sense of humor about it.
  • Communities may have 1% "high volume" participants, 9% "occasional" participants.  The remaining 90% often read, but do not overtly comment.  (ed. – that said, this "90%" group of constituents may be active participants in other communities, or may eventually move into the other 9% or 1% groups — they are just as critical to community health as the other groups)
  • Acknowledge first-time posters; it provides an example to the other 90% of of the community who read, but who have never posted.
  • Enforce the "living room rule" as a comment policy
  • Clearly state the mission of the community
  • Creators of the community need to be able to plan and understand that, if the community is successful, that the original community organizers will need to "let go" of the community and allow it to run on its own
  • "Serve first, then be called to lead" was suggested as a possible model
  • There is no "rule of thumb" for the projected lifespan of an online community – can be months to years or, conversely, some may never make it to launch

A Collaboration Case Study – A Day-By-Day Wiki Growth Journal

728455233_0d7b38ddeb_m
Jenny Ambrozek and team used a collaborative environment (in this case, a wiki) to author an article on "Connected Intelligence."  The wiki can be found here: Learning Through Participation and Connecting Intelligences: Experimenting with a Wiki to Co-create an Article

The project was very interesting in its introspection on what was working, and what wasn’t, as the process evolved.  The page on "Lessons," in particular, provides a great data point into what actually happened.

"June 29, 2007, with deadline looming. co-author Jenny Ambrozek posted
an article update and invitation to participate to the 21st Century
Organization blog 21st Century Blog


June 30 Knowledge Jolt blogger, Jack Vinson, blogged about our article writing experiment Jack Vinson Blog


July 2 Jenny Ambrozek in checking Technorati www.technorati.com for activity around our blog post also noted Jack Vinson’s Policies Can be Changed post and added a comment.


A Facebook www.facebook.com and email exchange followed. The Jack Vinson Wiki Page was created and we captured Jack’s insights about “policies” impacting knowledge sharing and learning in a real laboratory.


It took the wiki+blogs+Technorati+Facebook+email to gather the laboratory example.

Co-Creating Takes Time


It was 14 weeks from wiki creation to article deadline but the bulk of
activity happened in the last month. The authors had competing
commitments and it was only as the deadline approached and focused
their attention that real structural activity began. What we didn’t
realize was that although a collaborative product benefits from
connected intelligence, the production cycle must allow for more review
and reflection by the various participants.


Unknown is how many more people we could have reached, and how much
richer or different, this article would be if we had started outreach
earlier. As the wiki remains open so readers can contribute their
reactions and tell us what we’ve missed.

"

Check out the analysis of the evolution of the wiki here.

photo: tanio

Clue Unit #21: Community as Business – Rapid Fire

(iTunes) (MP3) (click here to subscribe)

Episode 21, about 30 minutes.

Today’s Topics:

  • Recap of "Community as Business" Focus
  • Craigslist and Small is Beautiful
  • Other Examples of Community as Business
  • MySpace and Marketing
  • iPhone Release as Cultural Event
  • Personal Updates

Related Links:

JPG Magazine
Threadless
Next Week: CRM and VRM, Doc Searls
Small is Beautiful
Craigslist ; Craig Newmark
Cult of the Amateur
Business Lifecycle in Community Context – What Can Community Do?
Fon;  Community Delivered Wi-fi
Moo Cards;  Appended to Existing Community – Flickr
MySpace  as Marketing Vehicle
X-Men Promotion on Myspace
iPhone  as Cultural Event
Categories of iPhone Line-Waiters
Will You Get an iPhone?
Nokia 770
Jake’s New Biz: Ant’s Eye View 
Cerado Gets New Offices
Common Craft – More Videos coming soon
Blogher 2007, Chicago

Why Customers Buy

Cmtv4n2cover
Interesting research from my alma mater CMU, on the neurological processes that occur at the moment we’re making a buying decision as customers.

"Their findings, recently published in Neuron,
suggest that there’s a battle in the brain between immediate pleasure
and immediate pain when we’re deciding what to buy. This contradicts
conventional economic theory, which states that people make decisions
based on immediate pleasure versus saving their buying power for some
future pleasure. The subjects in the MRI study weren’t thinking about
what benefits they would gain at some later date if they chose not to
purchase The Family Guy DVD set now. Rather, they were deciding based
on how painful (or not) they thought paying for it would be right now.

Loewenstein says that the findings helped
confirm what he and Prelec first noticed (i.e., that spending money can
be painful) in the early 1990s while collaborating on a paper. At the
time, they had to rely on mathematical models to prove their point. But
MRI technology now allows them to back up that claim with hard
data–real pictures of human brains that show real activity in the
brain’s pain center. Hard data is what Loewenstein hopes will
eventually lead to the acceptance of the field among doubters who still
hold fast to traditional economic theory.

Loewenstein hopes to follow up his research regarding the "pain of paying"
by exploring a growing and looming problem in the United States–why so
many people run up so much credit card debt. Much like he did in the
study with Knutson and Prelec, he wants to see what goes on in the
brain when someone pulls out plastic instead of money when making
purchases. His hypothesis is that credit cards numb the brain’s pain
center (i.e., reduce activity in the insular cortex) because no
currency is exchanged and costs are postponed, thus weakening the
body’s built-in defense mechanism against unnecessary purchases.
He
believes that MRI testing could provide definitive answers."
(empahsis added)

Read more here.

Sprint Fires Over 1,000 Customers

Sprint has fired over 1,000 of their customers.  On June 29, 2007, Sprint sent out letters to a number of customers that stated:

"Our records indicate that over the past year, we have received frequent calls from you regarding your billing or other general account information…Therefore, after careful consideration, the decision has been made to terminate your wireless service agreement effective July 30, 2007."

Here’s a copy of the letter:

Letter

image: MissDiva

I think Sprint’s move is terribly, well…uncreative.  You’ve got a group of over 1,000 very vocal customers.  Is there not a way to turn all that energy to good, mutual, use, where the customers can get their problems solved and can provide the organization with information or ideas that could help the rest of the customer base?  It makes me wonder — were the problems that these customers were having with the service unique in some way that made them difficult to resolve?  Or are the problems endemic within Sprint’s processes, and it’s just this group of customers that were actually following up and attempting to get them resolved, instead of rolling over?

(If you remember, I’ve had my own issues with Sprint over the past couple of years.)

Who else has had issues with Sprint recently?

More on the story here: