The CEO Blogging Trail

Axel Schultze, CEO of BlueRoads, had the following answers to the questions I posed in this post. Schultze:

“Very good and valid questions. Some answers:

1) Also CEO’s are human beings and have peers. So executive blogging will find it’s peers.

2) The blog will not replace 1:1 connections and relations. But if a CEO like me has roughly 5,000 personal contacts and roughly 200,000 customer contacts, touching each and everybody in person every week is REALLY difficult.

3) Ghost-Written? No! While my press releases are prepared by PR agencies and news letters by marketing and other media by other people, at least my blog is my “normal voice” :-). And one can tell by my style, grammer and the little spelling errors here and there.

Axel”

(n.b. Axel’s blog can be found here)

Point (2) is the gimme. And point (3) is spot-on.

Point (1), however, is the really interesting one. “Executive blogging will find its peers.” Hold that thought.

(context: I’m just off the plane, just back from Cambridge and Corante’s Symposium on Social Architecture. So, naturally, everything is getting filtered through that lens. More folks talking about CoranteSSA here.)

Blogs, of course, are social media. They let us connect, and converse, and interact in a human way.

Now, back to where we were. “Executive blogging will find its peers.” Hadn’t thought about the implication of that statement until I read Axel’s comment. When put through the “social” lens, what this means, to me at least, is that we’re going to start to see networks develop…visible networks…of executive bloggers. And what we’re going to see from there is the boardroom equivalent of the digital divide. One one side, we’ll see networks and clusters of interconnected executive bloggers (“peers”), who respect and challenge and publicly debate each others strategies, compliment and complement each others’ successes, and call each other out on their mis-steps.

On the flip side we’ll see the ossified companies, with their polished, impenetrable façades of business-as-usual.

Which side you think will be more successful in the long run?

tag:

Heavens To Marketroid!

Steve Hall asks, what if there was a “Customer Conversations Department?” Hall:

“I’d…suggest the creation of an entirely new discipline headed by a director of customer/consumer conversation/dialog. The sole responsibility if this person/department would be to converse and listen to the consumers with no interest in selling product.

This is not achieved though doing surveys or hosting focus groups or through agency account planning efforts. It is achieved by talking to customers/consumers as one would if they were discussing a product at a cookout or dinner party. This is not stuff that can be rolled up neatly into a spreadsheet of a PowerPoint presentation. This is roll-the-sleeves-up, get-dirty-with-the-customer conversation.”

I.love.it. But it shouldn’t be a “department.” It may need to start that way, but ultimately every person within an organization who comes in contact with a customer:

  • Marketing
  • Sales
  • Customer Support
  • Product Marketing
  • Delivery
  • Executives
  • etc.

needs to feel this way. Why? Because, customers don’t interact with a silo’d “department.” And every customer has the ability to talk about his or her experience with the company via these crazy, newfangled blog thingers…regardless of which department was involved in the interaction.

Tom Hespos runs with this idea. Hespos:

“I think we can agree that comparatively few companies have made any sort of investment in opening and continuing meaningful dialogue with their customers online. We’ve got the broadcast model to thank for that. As you know, when you’re holding a hammer, every problem starts to look like a nail. When folks are out there praising or panning a product or brand, corporations tend to look at the problem as a mass marketing problem. In reality, most of the panning can be dealt with effectively by empowering somebody to join the conversation, actually listen, and take the feedback to the company for incorporation. Most of the praise can be greatly amplified in the same way.”

and Doc pushes it further:

“This is a provocative proposition. What Tom’s talking about here is going way beyond the rogue Scoble, or even the hundreds (thousands?) inside companies like Microsoft and Sun. We’re talking here about changing marketing’s function (or a large part of it) from messaging to conversation.”

(Be sure to check out the spot-on comment from Mike Taht, which has a couple of great thoughts on what out-of-work marketers can put on their cardboard signs.)

This is the right direction. There are a few fundamental things that need to occur to keep this snowball rolling, however.

Per the comments from the others above, execs in organizations from the smallest to the largest need to get whupped upside the head with the clue mackerel, and understand what’s happening here.

Folks on the front lines need to get out of the “transactional” mindset, and start thinking about conversations, and relationships and communities.

Systems need to change. Existing (so-called) customer relationship management systems don’t get us there. Actually, I take that back. CRM systems could get us there, if the individuals using them started thinking about using the systems as tools to track persistent conversations over time (note: link is a PDF), as opposed to being tools that sales management uses to know how soon they need to warn Wall Street that they’re going to miss their quarter. (Don’t even get me started on the whole “living life one quarter at a time” mindset thing. Grrr.)

And, finally, from the “do-ocracyside of things, we, as customers, need to be rationally vocal when we are treated poorly (or ignored). As customers, we need to continue to let our service providers know when they are screwing up, through all means available. They can’t listen if we don’t talk, and write, and start voting with our wallets when they blow it.

So, my question to you…what do we need to do next to keep this going?

Links, all in one tidy place:

Related posts from The Social Customer Manifesto:

Dear Budget Rent-a-Car: Does Buzz Matter If Your Product Is A Commodity?

Evelyn Rodriguez doesn’t think so, and writes an open letter to Budget car rental in response to their recent blog-focused marketing hoo-ha. Evelyn says:

“I have a time budget, and I’ve no time for contests. Yet give out $160,000 to the most disruptive ideas – from employees or customers – who cares where the best ideas come from? – and I’d been intrigued to participate in investing in my own future customer experience. Why not incent us to come up with reasons so that a mere $3/day or $5/day or $15/day difference won’t make us fickle? (You know you’re a commodity when I have to look for the rental agreement jacket to remember which agency to return the car to at the airport.)

It’s self-evident that I like, trust and read blogs, but I ain’t changing my rental car buying behavior one iota. Back to the comparison engine next time – blog-based viral campaign or no.”

Also a great pointer to Eddy Sez:

“Craigslist has done precisely what a free market enterprise is envisioned to do … And contrary to every business school admonition, they have done this without thinking about and planning around their competitors. Instead they engaged the customer in dialogue and participation in the use of their service and acted in accordance with what they wanted.”

B-i-n-g-o. Although it’s critical to know what the competitors are doing (from both a strategic and a tactical standpoint), chasing them is folly, and pulls you away from what makes your organization unique. It’s the express train to me-too-ville.

Back to Budget…car rental companies are like the airlines right now. I hear that e-mietwagenkreta isn’t like all the other car companies at the moment with their great service, according to my friend anyway. Different colors on the outside, same indistinguishable service on the inside. Now Budget is “engaging the blogosphere.” Wieux-hieux! Here’s one thing you didn’t know aout car rental companies. They’re buying their cars on finance to reduce their overheads. Pretty clever, right? You can buy a car using finance as well. There are hundreds of models you can choose from and you could have a brand-new car on your drive in no time.

So.what.

If the cars are the same and I have whatever a rental car company’s “express” service is, I go to the bus, read my name on the board and get in the car and go. No differentiation.

If I don’t have the express service, I go to the counter in the airport, and get my little packet, then ride the bus to my car, and get in the car and go. No differentiation.

Budget and others, if you want to differentiate, really do it. Let’s look at the “express” process. In that case, there are two touch points with the customer – at reservation time, or when they get in the car. All your reservation systems are automated to the teeth, and I don’t see them changing any time soon. So your ONLY place to do something creative is in the car itself when it gets picked up. So think outside the box. Do something creative there.

  • Take the time to learn the radio presets I like (either by genre, market, or on XM), and preset the dial just for me.
  • If that’s too spendy, find out the genres that I like, and have a mix CD in the car of stuff I’ve never heard from that genre.
  • Ask me at registration time where I’m headed, and if I’d like you to print out directions for me and put them in the car (just in case I forget mine).

These are the types of things will make the experience different. Not “buzz.”

Carnivore Emptor

More lying to customers. From the LA Times:

“Kobe beef, it seems, is everywhere these days…What gives? How did Kobe beef become so ubiquitous? Well, the short answer is: because it’s not really Kobe beef. In the old days, back before 2002, when you saw it on the menu, there was a good chance it was actually Kobe — the real deal, imported from Japan.

Today, what is commonly called Kobe beef is really all-American — it comes from American-grown cattle that are crosses of traditional U.S. breeds such as Black Angus and bulls brought from Japan before 2002, when the Department of Agriculture outlawed the importation of Japanese beef, after several incidents of mad cow disease there.

At best, calling this beef Kobe is a term of commercial convenience…At worst, it borders on an outright lie. Both a waitress at Sterling Steak House and Sterling’s chef Andrew Pastore claimed their porterhouse was the real thing, imported straight from Japan. When told that if this was true, it was completely illegal. Pastore adopted a Brooklyn wise-guy stance: “I let my suppliers worry about that.”

The next day his publicist clarified that what Pastore really meant was that the meat came from Japanese cows that had been brought to the U.S. to be slaughtered — which would also be illegal.”

Why does this happen? And why is it so rampant? Hugh Macleod calls this “the ignorance premium.” Hugh:

“With the Ignorance Premium, you’re paying extra for not knowing. Instead of micro knowledge, you’re basing your choice on the cooler, hipper macro Brand Metaphor. Branding is all about about being cool and hip, because branding is all about propping up the Ignorance Premium.”

Still want to pay $175.95 a pound for “Kobe” filet?

(hat tip: Dan Gillmor)

Book Review #1: All Marketers Are Liars

Update Nov 2009: Seth changed the name of the book.

A story is a vehicle to characterize the essence of an occasion, a way to give context to an emotion, a way to capture and enhance a fleeting feeling. With a story one can, hopefully, communicate the spirit of a moment in time so fully and wonderfully that individuals who weren’t “there” can themselves share in the aspects of an experience and understand the core of the emotions that the originator felt when the actual experience occurred.

I love telling stories. Why? To build community. Stories about real occasions, real places, real friends are the fibers that knit themselves together and bind small, intimate groups. The shared histories. The lore. The remembrances of the silly things we did that our best friends will never, ever let us live down.

Over the weekend, I got an email from some friends who were hosting a dinner at an art studio and café that’s right on the ocean here in Half Moon Bay. “Show up any time after 5:30; we’ll be serving until 7:30 or so,” the note said. I pulled up about six, just as the sun was hanging brilliantly orange and precarious over the water. The room was impossibly small, maybe 14 feet square, with about a dozen strangers dining at two rectangular tables. The café’s weathered wooden walls, the outside covered with corrugated plastic, overlooked acres of open space and the Pacific. It looked a bit like a cabin from a summer camp from years long past. It’s a comfortable, well-worn place, an anachronism.

Not knowing anyone in the room, and seeing my friends via the pass-through, I walked around and snuck into the kitchen (hey, no one knows me here) to say “hi.” We chatted for a bit, got caught up (they’re thinking about building a new house). I was informed that if I was hungry, I should eat sooner rather than later, as they were likely to run out of food. I grabbed a plate (fresh-made veggie lasagna and a bit of salad made with lettuce picked five-minutes-ago in the community garden across the dirt driveway), ducked outside, and back into the main room. With much shuffling, place was made for me at the far table, with smiles and introductions around.

The next two hours magically flew. The sun crashed into the ocean, candles were lit, and the room warmed with yellow-orange candlelight and laughter-filled conversation between strangers-turned-friends. Pears with a hint of delicate maple syrup arrived. Wine flowed. Heaven.

Finally, tearing myself away (we had just finished a riotous discussion of the theological merits of pastafarianism), I said a hug-filled goodbye to my new friends, and stood up to leave. I then realized there wasn’t a check; there wasn’t a bill. There was a chalkboard by the screen door with prices on it, next to a hand-lettered wooden box that said “Donations.” I calculated my tab, added a few bucks on for good measure, dropped in a few bills, and said goodnight. It was a wonderful experience, one I hope to repeat many times.

In All Marketers Are Liars, Seth Godin tells us on Page One:

“This is a whole new way of doing business. It’s a fundamental shift in the paradigm of how ideas spread. Either you’re going to tell stories that spread, or you will become irrelevant.” (p.1 , EH)

Except…it’s not. The (ahem) earth-shattering “story” concept is, at most, an attempt to do a little spruce-up on the concept of the “experience economy” as outlined by Pine and Gilmore almost a decade ago. Yes, there are a few dollops of good common sense in All Marketers Are Liars, but “a whole new way of doing business?” C’mon.

(And, besides, after seeing a bunch of business plans in the late 90’s, I don’t know how many more “fundamental paradigm shifts” I can take. Of course, that just might be my lumbago acting up.)

Now, to be fair, there were a couple of diamonds in the rough. In particular,

“Some marketers focus so hard on the facts of their offering that they forget to tell a story at all, and then wonder why they’ve failed.” (p. 20, DIR)

is a point that needs to be posted outside the door of every founding CTO whose “grand architectural vision” is incomprehensible and irrelevant (and, ergo, un-saleable) to customers who have real-world issues they are trying to address. Similarly, the points on socially conscious investing and the need for human connection and authenticity are spot on. A couple of faves:

“Personal interaction cuts through all the filters.” (p. 113, DIR)

“Allowing your employees to post an honest blog or to engage in direct instant-messaging conversations with your customers is a way to promote honest communication. If it makes you nervous to do that, maybe you need to worry about authenticity a little more.” (p. 114, DIR)

The points above were the exception, however. In more than a few instances, the book’s advice jarred with a resounding clang. (Think Ethel Merman singing Ave Maria.) You know that sound your car makes when you try to start it when it’s already running? Some of the paragraphs are a lot like that.

The ones that got me the most were the ones that fairly seethed with disregard for the customer. Examples:

“Marketers aren’t liars. They are storytellers. It’s the consumers who are liars.” (p. 15, DFC)

“The lie a consumer tells himself is the nucleus at the center of any successful marketing effort.” (p. 157, DFC)

“It doesn’t really matter whether a story we tell to a consumer is completely factual.” (p. 73, DFC)

“If it’s a good story, if that story is framed in terms of his worldview, then he’ll tell himself the story and believe in the lie.” (p. 73, DFC)

Ick.

Moving from the emotional to the practical, the challenge with the ephemeral “story” concept is that it is designed to “work” (1) only when things are subjective and (2) primarily when the marketer’s main concern is grabbing the customer for the first time. If the “promises” of a story can be measured and don’t subsequently add up, the chance of building a real, non-synthetic long-term relationship with a customer where the customer becomes part of an community or ecosystem with a vendor is precisely nil. On the other hand, if you’re trying to succeed with yet another twist on yet another retail outlet, or trying to market yet another vacuous, “must have” brand of running shoe or SUV, maybe the story thing will work for you.

Interestingly enough, this short-term mindset seemed to permeate not only the book, but the support around it as well. The book was launched with great hype and (ahem) storytelling, complete with its own supporting blog. The blog was Vibrant! Dynamic! It showed examples of All! The! Lies! that illustrated the points made in the book.

The Liar’s Blog now sits dormant, stagnant since July, 2005. Somehow, that seems fitting.

The Big-Box-O-Annotated-Quotes from All Marketers Are Liars.


“Marketing, apparently, makes wine taste better. Marketing, in the form of an expensive glass and the story that goes with it, has more impact on the taste of wine than oak casks or fancy corks or the rain in June.” (p. 4, GUP)

“Kiehl’s customer’s are measuring the price paid compared to the experience of purchasing and the way that using the product makes them feel, it’s a no-brainer” (p. 12, EE)

“This seems obvious, doesn’t it?” (p. 38, SOO)

“People clump together into common worldviews, and your job is to find a previously undiscovered clump and frame a story for those people.” (p. 38, RW)

“Recently, Brad Anderson, Best Buy’s CEO, discovered that 100 million (about 20 percent) of Best Buy’s customers were actually costing the company money.” (p. 44, GUP, ADD) [ed. – Wait a minute…Best Buy has five hundred million customers? Like, twice the population of the United States? A bit of research shows an original source on this (it appears to be the WSJ, by the way), talks about 500 million customer visits a year. A very different thing altogether.]

“People with worldviews that are private, that are embarrassing to share or that belong to people who don’t like keeping up with the Joneses don’t offer as high a yield to marketers as other, more profitable ones.” (p. 57, SOO, ILT)

“[Ailment*] is caused by a shortage of dopamine.” (p. 68, FOW, ADD) (more here)

“The battle between Salesforce.com and Seibel [sic] is a great example.” (p. 82, ADD)

“Seibel [sic], 82-83” (index, ADD)

“It’s time we realized that there may be no more powerful weapon on Earth [than marketing].” (p. 107, EH)

“A resume, a job interview, a date: in all of these cases, when the person you’re dealing with has only a few moments to come to a conclusion about you, insisting on telling them just the facts is a sure way to fail.” (p. 135, GTR)

The Jeff Tweedy Story (p. 147, DIR, ADD – was actually reported in Wired in an interview with Xeni Jardin, and cited by Tim Manners in FastCompany…the implication in All Marketers Are Liars is that Manners did the reporting)

The RBC Story (p. 151, ADD – the market share figures given in the book disagree with the quotes attributed to McLaughlin, who was on the panel with Seth from where this vignette was likely sourced)


Legend:
ADD: Attention to Detail Disorder
DFC: Disregard For the Customer
DIR: Diamond In the Rough
EE: Experience Economy
EH: Excessive Hyperbole
FOW: Flat-Out Wrong
GTR: Guide to True Romance
GUP: Grand, Unsubstantiated Pronouncement
ILT: Ignores the Long Tail
RW: Reinvention of the Wheel
SOO: Statement Of the Obvious

* – Intentionally omitted here, as this error could erroneously cause this page to be elevated in search rankings based on incorrect information…follow the link for the whole bit.

Marketing, From The Customer’s Point Of View

Want to come out and connect with others who are thinking about how social media are changing marketing and customer relationships? You may be interested in attending one of the upcoming sessions of How Consumer Controlled Media Is Re-Shaping Your Online Go-To-Market Strategy.

The program is being hosted by the American Marketing Association, and we’ll start out our 3 city tour in Chicago, IL on October 28th.

Who else will be speaking? Check it out…


Podcasting/Video Blogs
Stowe Boyd, President, Corante, Get Real

RSS
Bill Flitter, Chief Marketing Officer, Pheedo, Pheedo Blog

Word of Mouth Marketing
Pete Blackshaw, Chief Marketing and Customer Satisfaction Officer, Intelliseek (New York session)
Andy Sernovitz, CEO, Word of Mouth Marketing Association, WOMMA (Chicago session)

Interactive Social Networking
Randal Moss, Project Specialist, American Cancer Society’s Futuring and Innovation Center

Social Networking
Christopher Carfi, Principal, Cerado, and author of The Social Customer Manifesto. (Chicago and Scottsdale sessions)
David Teten, CEO of Nitron Advisors (New York session)

Power Law Structure
Judith T. Meskill, Principal, Meskill.net, Judith Meskill’s Knowledge Notes


Session dates:

  • October 28 – Chicago
  • November 11 – Scottsdale
  • December 2 – New York

More info here, including how to register.

Hope to see you in Chicago, Scottsdale, or New York!

Evocative

Went to the store with the five-year-old yesterday, with the intention of picking up a scooter. You know, one of the Razor-like things for cruising up and down the sidewalk.

Then we both saw it at the same time. It’s even more gorgeous in person.

(But it’s a friggin’ bike. Nope. It’s a work of art.)

When he insists on riding his bike before school in the morning, you know they did something right. Here’s their site, which keeps the promise intact. And here is the action shot of the little guy tearing up the sidewalk.

I may need one as well.

Stingrayburn640x480